Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rachael's avatar

Interesting and impressively ACX-esque piece of original research. Those indices are an illuminating way of categorising past and potential future elections.

I think turnout will matter more than you suggest. I think it will continue its downward trajectory and there will be even more of a "plague on both your houses" effect, as voters who resented the corruption and/or austerity under the Conservatives and thought Labour would solve it (especially those too young to have known any government but Conservative) realise it's business as usual on both counts and become disillusioned.

This, of course, makes it even more difficult to predict the outcome, as it depends on the views of the shrinking remnant who still vote, rather than of the whole country. I'm guessing it will help the three second-tier parties, as their platforms all have an element of "we represent genuine change" and they haven't had a chance to disprove that. (Although there will probably also be an effect where the remaining supporters of both of the big two parties are the most loyal and dedicated ones, with the more swing-y ones defecting to other parties and the more cynical ones defecting to "none" - which means that of those declaring Con or Lab support in the polls, a higher proportion than usual will actually vote that way.)

I also think Starmer won't last until 2029, with how early and how quickly his approval rating is plummeting and the various bribery scandals surrounding him. I think your "Starmer scrapes by" scenario will actually be "Labour scrapes by with some other leader". (Although you have much more insight than I do into what does or doesn't result in changes in party leadership, which can look a bit arbitrary from the outside, so ICBW.)

Expand full comment
Oli's avatar

“The Fragmentation Index” - Bob Howard goes back to his roots as an IT guy and fixes some slow hard drives.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts