Just chipping in as a climate scientist. Unfortunately children born today being condemned to a life of climate-related misery is a very real possibility.
Misery in the "life is worse than it would have been if we'd gotten a grip on this climate thing" or "life is worse than humans had it pre the industrial revolution. It's so bad one could actually make a case for not having kids for their sake"
I’ve definitely had to become more comfortable with the block function as I’ve gained more followers. Lots of people who are persistently rude or find delight in misrepresenting points of view. I released that I wouldn’t put up with it in person so why should I do so online?
Just chipping in as a climate scientist. Unfortunately children born today being condemned to a life of climate-related misery is a very real possibility.
Misery in the "life is worse than it would have been if we'd gotten a grip on this climate thing" or "life is worse than humans had it pre the industrial revolution. It's so bad one could actually make a case for not having kids for their sake"
I’ve definitely had to become more comfortable with the block function as I’ve gained more followers. Lots of people who are persistently rude or find delight in misrepresenting points of view. I released that I wouldn’t put up with it in person so why should I do so online?
Absolutely!
Thanks for sharing. X and Bluesky sound awful, I'll stick to Facebook.
Social media can give us an [un]realistic view
orinteracting feels cramped and would like more space.
Is footnote 9 intending to refer to footnote 4, or did some other footnotes get added and mess up your reference?
Point 15 breaks off mid sentence
X and BlueSky are fundamentally a broadcast medium, [not] somewhere where you have a duty to reply to all.
Footnote 10 ends in a comma
Nice fast work fixing all these! But there's still an "amd" that should be "and".