Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joseph Conlon's avatar

What makes you so strongly attached to the OBR (given it was established in 2010 and so is hardly part of the constitutional bedrock)? It's not my professional area -- perhaps I am missing something -- but as with many on the right I have a natural suspicion of bodies which seem to subcontract the proper democratic duty of government to take long-term decisions to some nebulous notion of all-knowing apolitical expertise.

More particularly: I do not believe that being (say) a Treasury economist gives anyone special insight into the political settlement required for long-term human flourishing. I would wager good money that if the equivalent of the OBR had been asked to predict the relative long-term economic impact of the American and Soviet revolutions, it would have got these spectacularly wrong -- and likewise with the economic divergence of North and South Korea after the Korean war.

Why should I trust the OBR to make better long-term judgements of the impact of Brexit, Covid lockdowns, the current war in Iran etc than the electorate who choose a government to take decisions?

Sui Juris's avatar

I’m surprised you’re surprised about the results on the Office of Budget Responsibility.

I suspect that most people on the right (like me and you) are in favour of fiscal responsibility. (Actually I suspect that most people on the left - with some exceptions - are in favour of fiscal responsibility too.) But the OBR is a very New-Labour-shaped solution to the problem (‘let’s set up a quango and outsource good judgement to them’).

So although the OBR’s effect is probably directionally positive, it feels like an offensively unconstitutional feature (compared to our pre-Blair constitution). It fits with what I think is my criticism (probably a common one on the right?) of the Cameron governments: Tory ends but New Labour means. So I’m not surprised that your right-wing respondents want it away with the rest.

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?